By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 3, 2012//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Civil
Employment — unemployment compensation — misconduct
Lalita A. Sallis appeals, pro se, the circuit court’s order affirming an order entered by the Labor and Industry Review Commission that denied Sallis’s application for unemployment compensation because it determined that Stein Optical fired Sallis, an optometrist assistant, for misconduct. Sallis argues that the Commission erred because: (1) she contends that there was no evidence, other than hearsay, to support a finding of misconduct; and (2) it did not credit her undisputed testimony that she had created false appointments previously for a Stein Optical doctor who needed to leave early. We affirm. Publication in the official reports is not recommended.
2011AP2531 Sallis v. Labor and Industry Review Commission, et al.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Brash, J., Fine, J.
Attorneys: For Appellant: Sallis, Lalita A., pro se; For Respondent: Shampo, Jeffrey J., Madison; Shillingstad, Hal A., Minneapolis