By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 28, 2012//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Robbery — sufficiency of the evidence
In these consolidated appeals, Maurice L. Bizzle appeals from judgments of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the crime of robbery with use of force. He further contends that he is entitled to a new trial because his right to be present at trial was violated. Finally, he contends that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We reject Bizzle’s claims and affirm the judgments and order. This opinion will not be published.
2011AP1108-CR, 2011AP1109-CR State v. Bizzle
Dist II, Racine County, Flancher, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Roemaat, Sara Heinemann, Wauwatosa; For Respondent: Chiapete, W. Richard, Racine; Lloyd, Katherine Desmond, Madison