Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

TRO — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 8, 2012//

TRO — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 8, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

TRO — sufficiency of the evidence

James M. Johnson appeals from a judgment of conviction for violating a temporary restraining order (TRO). Johnson argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him, the complaint was frivolous and untimely, and the judge prejudiced the jury with his explanation of reasonable doubt. All of Johnson’s arguments are without merit, and we thus affirm the conviction. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP2374-CR State v. Johnson

Dist II, Waukesha County, Kieffer, J., Neubauer, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Johnson, James M., pro se; For Respondent: Weber, Gregory M., Madison; Hirt, Lindsey Humphrey, Waukesha

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests