Family; Property division; valuation

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 23, 2011//

Listen to this article

Family
Property division; valuation

Andy W. Dehart appeals from an order deciding certain postjudgment matters after his divorce from Sommer J. Dehart. The parties reached an agreement on all issues except those relating to the stock options Andy exercised during the marriage and while the divorce was pending. Andy argues that to the extent the proceeds were used to satisfy the couple’s financial obligations, they should not also have been included in the equitable distribution scheme. He also argues that the trial court erred in valuing the stock options when it accepted the exercise price as the value. We agree in both regards. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP493 Dehart v. Dehart

Dist. II, Ozaukee County, Williams, J., per curiam.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Vitek, Nina M., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Zickuhr, Margaret G., Grafton; Woodward, Johnathan G., Grafton

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event