Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 26, 2011//

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 26, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence

Richard M. Arnold appeals from a judgment convicting him of repeated sexual assault of the same child and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Arnold contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by not either releasing to him any of the records it reviewed in camera or granting a new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence. Alternatively, he claims a new trial should be ordered in the interest of justice. His arguments are unpersuasive. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP1532-CR State v. Arnold

Dist II, Winnebago County, Gritton, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Kachinsky, Leonard D., Appleton; For Respondent: Wellman, Sally L., Madison; Gossett, Christian A., Oshkosh

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests