By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 26, 2011//
By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 26, 2011//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence
Richard M. Arnold appeals from a judgment convicting him of repeated sexual assault of the same child and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Arnold contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by not either releasing to him any of the records it reviewed in camera or granting a new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence. Alternatively, he claims a new trial should be ordered in the interest of justice. His arguments are unpersuasive. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
Dist II, Winnebago County, Gritton, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Kachinsky, Leonard D., Appleton; For Respondent: Wellman, Sally L., Madison; Gossett, Christian A., Oshkosh