Judicial Commission to review Supreme Court choking case

Listen to this article

The Wisconsin Judicial Commission is next in line to take a crack at getting to the bottom of the alleged choking incident involving two Wisconsin Supreme Court justices.

The commission is charged with reviewing judicial misconduct to determine if further investigation is needed and any potential discipline to include reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal.

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley has accused Justice David Prosser of putting her in a chokehold in front of four other justices during a June discussion about a lawsuit challenging Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s law eliminating most public workers’ union rights.

Last Thursday, Sauk County District Attorney Patricia Barrett, who was acting as a special prosecutor in the case, announced she wouldn’t file criminal charges against either Walsh Bradley or Prosser, saying the accounts of what happened differed too greatly.

In a statement attributed to James Alexander, executive director of the Judicial Commission, he said the commission’s ongoing investigation will be “thorough, fair and in accord with procedures set forth,” by state statute.

The Commission has not established a timeline for its review, according to the statement.

Alexander did not immediately return calls seeking additional comment.

Read more on the case

• Racial justice task force issues recommendations
• Stanford rape case raises question of when judges should be punished
• Prosser says dissention on high court overblown
• Supreme Court marshal acknowledges safety plan, contradicting DOA claims (UPDATE)
• Bradley claims no political motivation in releasing memo (UPDATE)
• Challengers push for Wis. Supreme Court personality change
• Wis. high court candidates file nomination papers
• Editorial: The cost of justice
• Justice Gableman recuses himself from Prosser discipline case
• Walker weighs in on Supreme Court justice complaints