2010AP403 Teske v. Wausau Heart & Lung Surgeons SC, et al.

Listen to this article

Evidence
Insurance policies; admissions by party

Holly Teske, personally and as special administrator of the Estate of Gary Teske, appeals a judgment and order denying her pretrial evidentiary motions, post-trial motions for a new trial, and her motion to supplement the appellate record. Teske argues the circuit court erred by prohibiting her from: (1) introducing insurance policy evidence; (2) using defense counsel’s deposition questions and lack of objections as admissions by a party opponent; and (3) supplementing the record with a video not used at trial.

Teske also asserts she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the real controversy has not been tried. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP403 Teske v. Wausau Heart & Lung Surgeons SC, et al.

Dist III, Lincoln County, Tlusty, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Maeder, Jerome A., Wausau; Welch, Benjamin, Wausau; For Respondent: Corneille, Barrett J., Madison; Pliner, David J., Madison; Uebelher, Crystal M., Green Bay

Full Text