By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 19, 2011//
Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance
Michael Hudson appeals the judgment of conviction of one count of child enticement and one count of sexual assault of a child under Wis. Stat. §§ 948.07(1) and 948.02(1)(b) (2009-10). He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Hudson seeks a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. He asserts that his trial counsel was deficient for failing to use at trial a medical report and DNA evidence to impeach the credibility of the victim. We conclude counsel was not ineffective.
We affirm the judgment and order of the circuit court. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP749-CR State v. Hudson
Dist IV, La Crosse County, Levine, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Hudson, Michael W., pro se; For Respondent: Gruenke, Tim, La Crosse; Remington, Christine A., Madison