Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP749-CR State v. Hudson

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 19, 2011//

2010AP749-CR State v. Hudson

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 19, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance

Michael Hudson appeals the judgment of conviction of one count of child enticement and one count of sexual assault of a child under Wis. Stat. §§ 948.07(1) and 948.02(1)(b) (2009-10). He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Hudson seeks a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. He asserts that his trial counsel was deficient for failing to use at trial a medical report and DNA evidence to impeach the credibility of the victim. We conclude counsel was not ineffective.

We affirm the judgment and order of the circuit court. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP749-CR State v. Hudson

Dist IV, La Crosse County, Levine, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Hudson, Michael W., pro se; For Respondent: Gruenke, Tim, La Crosse; Remington, Christine A., Madison

Full Text

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests