Quantcast

10-2303 U.S. v. Duncan (access required)

POSTED: Friday, April 22nd, 2011 at 11:43 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Sentencing Crack cocaine That the government did not oppose a co-defendant’s motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) does not entitle the defendant to a reduction. “As for the issue of a codefendant’s successful § 3582(c)(2) motion, the distinction here is that the government did, in fact, oppose Mr. Duncan’s motion. It is not for this Court ...

Subscribers get free access to our whitepaper library. Recent topics include:

The road less travelled: unusual legal practice areas

Exit strategy: a solo and small firm lawyer's guide to the how and when of retirement

Try us for 30 days and see!

Already a subscriber? Claim your Whitepapers here.

Comments are closed.

Today’s Case Digests





Copyright © 2013, The Daily Reporter Publishing Co., 225 E. Michigan St., Suite 540, Milwaukee, WI 53202