2010AP1028 State v. Williams

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 8, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Successive appeals

Lawrence Williams appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 postconviction motion, from an order denying his motion for reconsideration, and from the underlying judgment of conviction. We conclude that Williams’s postconviction motion is procedurally barred because Williams fails to allege a sufficient reason for not previously raising his claims as required by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181-82, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶¶25-27, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574.

Therefore, we affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2010AP1028 State v. Williams

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wells, Cimpl, JJ., Brennan, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Williams, Lawrence, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Freimuth, James M., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event