Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP11-CR State v. Kunselman

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 17, 2010//

2010AP11-CR State v. Kunselman

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 17, 2010//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance; attorney-client privilege

Christopher J. Kunselman appeals from a judgment convicting him of first-degree reckless injury and aggravated battery and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that trial counsel’s breach of the attorney-client privilege was deficient performance because he failed both to inform Kunselman that he gave the prosecution a copy of Kunselman’s written statement and to prepare Kunselman for the damaging cross-examination that counsel reasonably should have known would ensue. In a case that so hinged on credibility, counsel’s deficient performance undermines our confidence in the reliability of the outcome. We reverse and remand for a new trial. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP11-CR State v. Kunselman

Dist II, Sheboygan County, Langhoff, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Sczygelski, Ralph, Manitowoc; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; DeCecco, Joseph R., Sheboygan

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests