Since Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), testimonial statements are inadmissible under the Confrontation Clause unless the declarant testifies subject to cross examination.
Michael O’Hear discusses bankruptcy fraud.
Link
The confrontation clause and plain error at the Federal Evidence Blog.
Link
![[Print]](http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
Post a Comment