Quantcast

Judge DiMotto on judicial substitution

POSTED: Monday, February 8th, 2010 at 1:00 am

BY: dmc-admin

Tags:

In my last post, I discussed the procedure to remove a judge via recusal. Removal via recusal is dependent on the existence of a statutory impediment (757.19) or a statement by the individual judge that he/she does not believe he/she should be the adjudicator for the case for reasons certain. However, in Wisconsin every party has the right, for any reason or no reason, to have a judge assigned to the case removed via substitution.

David Lat on attempts to bring the cast of The Jersey Shore to UW’s law school commencement.
Link

Judge DiMotto on judicial substitution.
Link

Michael O’Hear on “crimes of violence” in the Seventh Circuit.
Link

Subscribers get free access to our whitepaper library. Recent topics include:

The road less travelled: unusual legal practice areas

Exit strategy: a solo and small firm lawyer's guide to the how and when of retirement

Try us for 30 days and see!

Already a subscriber? Claim your Whitepapers here.

Leave a Reply

Today’s Case Digests





Copyright © 2013, The Daily Reporter Publishing Co., 225 E. Michigan St., Suite 540, Milwaukee, WI 53202