01-1908-FT City of Menomonie v. Herman

By: dmc-admin//December 3, 2001//

Listen to this article

Jeno Herman appeals a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to request and administer field sobriety tests.

This court rejects Herman’s argument and affirms the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Dunn County, Stewart, J., Hoover, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: William A. Schembera, Menomonie

For Respondent: James M. Peterson, Menomonie; Kenneth E. Schofield, Menomonie

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event