Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-3377 State v. Rittenhouse

By: dmc-admin//November 5, 2001//

00-3377 State v. Rittenhouse

By: dmc-admin//November 5, 2001//

Listen to this article

Jeffrey J. Rittenhouse appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. He seeks to have his convictions dismissed based upon the denial of a speedy trial. In the alternative, he claims entitlement to withdraw his pleas of no contest to seven misdemeanor convictions because his counsel was ineffective in failing to litigate the illegal seizure and subsequent search of an automobile containing evidence of his crimes.

We are not persuaded by Rittenhouse’s arguments and affirm the orders.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Sheboygan County, Langhoff, J., Snyder, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jeffrey J. Rittenhouse, Sayre, OK

For Respondent: James P. Van Akkeren, Sheboygan; Susan M. Crawford, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests