Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-0261-CR State v. Dixon

By: dmc-admin//October 22, 2001//

01-0261-CR State v. Dixon

By: dmc-admin//October 22, 2001//

Listen to this article

Sharon Dixon appeals from the judgment of conviction entered after a jury convicted her of one count of arson of a building, party to a crime and one count of possession of a controlled substance. Dixon also appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion to suppress and her motion for postconviction relief. Dixon claims that: (1) she was denied her constitutional right to confront the witnesses against her; (2) her trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the search warrant affidavit was insufficient to support a finding of probable cause; and (4) the search warrant did not authorize the seizure of two safes from her residence.

We disagree and affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Lamelas, Fiorenza, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Alex Flynn, Milwaukee; Adam B. Stephens, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Warren D. Weinstein, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests