Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

99-3323 Malachinski v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

By: dmc-admin//October 8, 2001//

99-3323 Malachinski v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

By: dmc-admin//October 8, 2001//

Listen to this article

“Even if Dr. Malachinski’s remittance could be considered a payment rather than a deposit when it was transferred and credited to his 1982 account, sec. 6512(b)(4) nevertheless prevents the tax court from exercising jurisdiction over the remittance. … The Senate Report explains that … ‘the Tax Court does not have jurisdiction over the validity or merits of the credits or offsets that reduce or eliminate the refund to which the taxpayer was otherwise entitled.’… [T]he tax court lacked jurisdiction to determine whether Dr. Malachinski was entitled to a credit for the $20,400 remittance.”

Affirmed.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court, Gale, J., Ripple, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests