Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-3312-CR State v. Cruz

By: dmc-admin//September 24, 2001//

00-3312-CR State v. Cruz

By: dmc-admin//September 24, 2001//

Listen to this article

Antonio Q. Cruz appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice because the trial court admitted prejudicial testimony, and erroneously exercised its discretion when it allowed the State to introduce other testimony.

Because we conclude that he is not entitled to a new trial and the evidence was properly admitted, we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Kenosha County, Bastianelli, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Michael Yovovich, Madison

For Respondent: Robert J. Jambois, Kenosha; Jeffrey J. Kassel, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests