Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-2914 State v. Krause

By: dmc-admin//September 4, 2001//

00-2914 State v. Krause

By: dmc-admin//September 4, 2001//

Listen to this article

James D. Krause appeals pro se from an order denying his postconviction motions for sentence modification and for a restitution hearing. Krause argues that the trial court failed to articulate adequate grounds for denying the motions without a hearing.

We agree and reverse the order and remand for further proceedings.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Walworth County, Carlson, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: James D. Krause, Winnebago

For Respondent: Phillip A. Koss, Elkhorn; James H. McDermott, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests