01-0489-CR State v. Dahl

By: dmc-admin//July 30, 2001//

By: dmc-admin//July 30, 2001//

Listen to this article

Thomas Dahl appeals from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Dahl contends that Wis. Stat. sec. 343.305, Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and that testing blood drawn in compliance with the Implied Consent Law is a separate search, requiring a warrant.

We disagree and affirm.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, Rock County, Byron, J., Dykman, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Michele Anne Tjader, Madison; Erik H. Monson, Madison

For Respondent: Raymond L. Jablonski, Janesville; Richard J. Sullivan, Janesville

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People