00-2059-CR State v. Craig

By: dmc-admin//July 2, 2001//

Listen to this article

Darnial C. Craig appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that he was denied due process of law because the prosecutor referred to a sexual assault committed by his co-actor during the course of the burglary, because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it allowed testimony about the sexual assault, and because he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We conclude that the evidence referred to was admissible, the prosecutor did not err by referring to it, and the court did not err by allowing it. We also conclude that counsel was not ineffective.

Therefore, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Kenosha County, Fisher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: James R. Lucius, Greenfield

For Respondent: Robert J. Jambois, Kenosha; Sally L. Wellman, Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event