Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-2669 Friedman, et al. v. Stueber, et al.

By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2001//

00-2669 Friedman, et al. v. Stueber, et al.

By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2001//

Listen to this article

David Friedman appeals a summary judgment dismissing his insurer, USAA Casualty Insurance Co. He contends that his USAA uninsured and underinsured motorist policy covers his injuries because they were caused by an accident. Alternatively, Friedman argues that summary judgment should not have been granted because the facts raise conflicting inferences. He submits that a jury must resolve the conflicting inferences. We agree that the facts raise conflicting inferences and therefore reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Lenz, J., Hoover, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Catherine Ruth Munkittrick, River Falls

For Respondent: Dennis M. Sullivan, Eau Claire

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests