Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-1607 Bidstrup, et al. v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services

By: dmc-admin//June 11, 2001//

00-1607 Bidstrup, et al. v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services

By: dmc-admin//June 11, 2001//

Listen to this article

The Department of Health and Family Services (DHFS) appeals from an order directing it to grant Medical Assistance benefits to the eight Respondents, after some of the Respondents prevailed in a related federal suit. DHFS argues that the Respondents’ claims for these benefits are barred by a number of statutory and common law rules. The Respondents counter that they should be allowed to maintain their claims because they did not receive proper notice of their appeal rights in an initial termination. We agree that the Respondents received improper notice. However, we conclude that the issue of defective notice became moot with regard to five of the eight Respondents who challenged the termination despite DHFS’s initial failure to notify them of appeal rights. With respect to those five Respondents, we also conclude that they cannot now make claims relying on constitutional arguments that they should have raised in circuit court when they first challenged their terminations. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, Jefferson County, Koschnick, J., Dykman, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Bruce A. Olsen, Madison

For Respondent: Gregory P. Seibold, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests