By: dmc-admin//June 4, 2001//
Roger Oligney appeals an order denying his motion for relief from a judgment divorcing him from Nancy Coronado and another order finding him in contempt for failing to comply with the divorce judgment. He claims the trial court: (1) erroneously included assets he had acquired prior to the marriage in the marital estate; (2) erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing a 60/40 property division; and (3) refused to allow Roger to present evidence that he was unable to comply with the equalization provision due to financial hardship. Nancy claims the appeal is frivolous and requests costs and attorney’s fees under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25(3) (1999-2000). We agree that the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s orders and remand for a determination of the amount of costs and attorney’s fees. This opinion will not be published.
Dist IV, Waushara County, Murach, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Jared Redfield, Stevens Point
For Respondent: Jeffrey T. Haase, Berlin